中文 | ENG

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Predatory publisher and low standard journal: An emerging problem in clinical surgery field

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Conflict of interest in clinical surgery: Contemporary concern in digital era

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Postpublication redecision and pitfalls of inadequate standards in scientific surgical journals: Important consideration in academic publication

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Spontaneous bilateral basal ganglia hemorrhage

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Academic characterization of the Formosan Journal of Surgery: A five-year bibliometric analysis

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Supra-sternal reconstruction for a high-hanging fruit like right subclavian artery aneurysm

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Operations for choledochal cysts: A 25-year experience at a tertiary care center in India

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
A case report: Can a titanised polypropylene mesh (TiMesh) obviate a dual mesh for sandwich technique for parastomal hernias?

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Recurrent gallstone ileus, a deadly encounter: A case report

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
The changes in dietary intake and tolerance for Chinese food after bariatric surgery in Taiwan

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Diagnostic value of trans-recto-perineal ultrasound in perianal fistula—preoperative versus intraoperative findings: A comparative cross-section study

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Efficacy and safety of extended-release dinalbuphine sebacate for postoperative analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

.........................

第58卷 第2期 2025-3
Dynamic changes in segmented neutrophil-to-monocyte ratio in trauma patients with stress-induced hyperglycemia: A retrospective study

.........................

第58卷 第1期 2025-1
Ensuring authorship qualification in clinical research articles: A focus on surgical therapy studies

.........................

第58卷 第1期 2025-1
Estimated risk for transfusion of monkeypox contaminated perioperative blood transfusion: A call to action for stronger regulations and testing protocols

.........................

第58卷 第1期 2025-1
Insights into traumatic and crisis surgery: Implications of data analysis in conflict zones

.........................

第58卷 第1期 2025-1
Tongue peeling as an adverse reaction with use of micronized purified flavonoid: A case report

.........................

第58卷 第1期 2025-1
Pilonidal sinus of scrotum: A rare clinical entity

.........................

第58卷 第1期 2025-1
Incidental autopsy finding of retiform hemangioendothelioma of the spleen

.........................

第58卷 第1期 2025-1
Retroperitoneal laparoscopy for hydronephrosis due to multiple fibroepithelial polyps: A case series

.........................
登入帳號才能閱讀全文
 
篇名 Comparative analysis of onlay and sublay (retrorectus) mesh repair for incisional hernia (width ≤10 cm) of abdominal wall: A single‑center experience
作者 Manoj Kumar, Manoj Kumar, Ashesh Kumar Jha, Abhishek Arora, P. P. Sreepriya, B. S. Niroop, Md. Ashraf Ali
卷期/出版年月 55卷1期 (2022/2)
頁次 1-6
摘要 Background: Incisional hernia repair is one of the most common procedures performed in general surgery. Onlay and sublay mesh repair both are well established techniques for the locations of mesh placement, but with various benefits and drawbacks. Despite various studies, the debate continues regarding preferring one technique over the other. We aim to compare the outcome of hernia repair between these two techniques. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis was done on patients who underwent open onlay/sublay hernia repair from February 2018 to March 2020 at our institute. 9–28 months of follow‑up was done. Primary outcome was recurrence. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications including surgical site infection, hematoma, seroma, wound dehiscence, peri‑operative pain, persistent seroma, readmission after 30 days and chronic pain. Results: A total of 87 patients underwent open ventral hernia repair during the study period. Of which, 41 had onlay and 46 had sublay repair (SR). Recurrence occurred in five patients (12.2%) with onlay repair and two patients in sublay group (4.3%) after a follow‑up duration of up to 28 months (P = 0.247). Wound complications were more common in onlay group (46.3%) than the sublay group (19.5%) (P = 0.008). The mean standard deviation intraoperative blood loss (mL) was significantly higher in sublay group (156 [96]) than onlay group (123 [110]) (P < 0.0001). The postoperative drain output and the duration of placement were both greater in the onlay group (P < 0.0001). The median (range) of hospital stay was significantly longer in the onlay group (5[3–10] days) than the sublay group (4[2–6] days) (P < 0.001). Conclusion: SR seems to be the better technique taking into account the overall morbidity, although the need for multi‑centric trials with patient‑centered outcomes should be highlighted to settle the debate.
關鍵詞 Incisional hernia, mesh repair, onlay, retrorectus, sublay
分類 Original Article

台灣外科醫學會雜誌 © 2006 Taiwan Surgical Association All Rights Reserved
會 址:台北市南京東路五段 31 號 3 樓
電 話:(02) 2769-7845 傳 真:(02) 2746-7149 Email: journal@surgery.org.tw